Riva'atul Adaniah Wahab


The digital divide for disabilities is a barrier to information acquisition, which is a basic need for self-development, social environment, and participation in national development. However, the implementation of Indonesian government policies and programs still has not shown the expected results. From the access aspect, some disabilities cannot obtain ICT infrastructures. Moreover, the challenge in accessing the government web is due to the inconsistent implementation of policies. From the ability aspect, the stigma of discrimination that is still developing in educational institutions and the private sector are an integral obstacle to encourage productivity, absorption in the workforce, or open employment opportunities. Thus, the target of fulfilling the proportion of people with disabilities in employment cannot be achieved. Those require collaboration and cooperation between the central government sector, local and central government, central government and private, and educational institutions to fulfill their rights and be able to compete in local, national, and international scale. Furthermore, a joint commitment is required in the form of policy or affirmative policy accompanied by supervision and periodic evaluation with clear standards that encourage the fulfillment of the rights of people with disabilities to ICT. 


digital divide, disabilities, ICT, social inclusion, technology inclusion.

Full Text:



Abanumy, A., Al-badi, A., & Mayhew, P. (2005). e-Government Website Accessibility : In-Depth Evaluation of Saudi Arabia and Oman. The Electronic Journal of E-Government, 3(3), 99–106.

Biro Humas Kemkominfo. (2017). Jambore TIK bagi Remaja dan Dewasa dengan Disabilitas Tingkat Nasional Tahun 2017. Retrieved from

Hutabarat, D. (2016). Tingkatkan Literasi dan Pemanfaatan TIK Penyandang Disabilitas. Retrieved from

Kemenkominfo. (2017). Survey Penggunaan TIK Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Aspek Sosial Budaya Masyarakat.

Khetarpal, A. (2014). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Disability. Review of Market Integration, 6(1), 96–113.

Kompasiana. (2017). Screen Reader, Teknologi Pembantu Tunanetra untuk Membaca Layar Gawai. Retrieved from

Masyhur, F. (2015). Evaluasi Aksesibilitas Website Resmi Kementerian dan Lembaga Menggunakan Pedoman WCAG 2 . 0 Ministries and Institutions Official Website Accessibility Evaluation Using WCAG 2 . 0. In Temu Ilmiah Peneliti Kominfo (pp. 1–10).

Mavrou, K., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Kärki, A., Sallinen, M., & Hoogerwerf, E. J. (2017). Opportunities and challenges related to ICT and ICT-AT use by people with disabilities: An explorative study into factors that impact on the digital divide. Technology and Disability, 29, 63–75.

Nugraheny, D. E. (2016). Kemenaker: Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja Penyandang Disabilitas Proporsional. Retrieved from

Nursyamsi, F., Arifianti, E. D., Aziz, M. F., Bilqish, P., & Marutama, A. (2015). Kerangka Hukum: Disabilitas di Indonesia: Menuju Indonesia Ramah Disabilitas. Jakarta.

Prestianta, A. M., Mardjianto, F. L. D., & Ignatius, H. T. N. (2018). Meta Analisis Platform Media Digital Ramah Penyandang Disabilitas. LUGAS Jurnal Komunikasi, 2(2), 69–80.

Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang No. 14 Tahun 2008 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik.

Satu Data Indonesia. (2017). Perlindungan dan Pemberdayaan Penyandang Disabilitas. Jakarta.

WebAIM. (2018). WebAIM’s WCAG 2 Checklist. Retrieved from

Wilson, D. S., & Kirman, A. (2016). Complexity and Evolution: Toward a New Synthesis for Economics.

Windasari, I. P., Surendro, K., & Digital, A. K. (2011). Pengukuran Kesenjangan Digital di Institusi Pemerintah Daerah ( Studi Kasus : Pemerintah Kota Semarang ). Jurnal Sistem Komputer, 1(2), 71–76.


  • There are currently no refbacks.